Police were zealous to find the "murderer" because of
political pressure, and acted on what was best for them rather than the
evidence. They had its own preconceived notions from the moment they
arrived on the murder scene and examined only the "evidence" that fit
their theories.
Police admit in transcripts of taped interviews that Virginia
offered them the killer's DNA, the fresh blood and skin from under her
nails minutes after they arrived. She had contact with the
killer. Yet, police refused to take skin
samples from her saying they could not use them. This is very
disturbing since this evidence would have cleared her. They were not
interested.
On the day of the murder police lied on a Supplementary Report
for case building and then again days later on other documents and
finally police lied to a Judge
to get a search warrant. They found nothing.
Despite the biased media coverage,
the court did not change the venue as is commonly
done.
The prosecutors elicited information from immunized
witnesses (witness who escaped prosecution on other pending criminal
cases in return for their testimony) who fabricated responses to fit
police theories while under duress. Her conviction was based on what
these people said--not physical evidence.
Virginia's defense attorney's did not
summon the 40-plus defense witnesses available. Instead, they
brought the trial to conclusion after only four-five minutes of defense
testimony.
People possibly involved in the murder could not keep their
stories straight. They also enjoyed bragging about their participation
in the crime.
Virginia's complaints about her attorney proved correct when
he was convicted for perjury, embezzlement and drug money laundering. He is now serving an 54 month sentence.
We have read media hype that Virginia took out 7 separate
insurance polices that would give the reader the impression she went
behind Norm's back and collected policies from whom ever would give them
to her. The facts are here.
Because of all of the above, Virginia was convicted through the efforts
of prosecutor misconduct, jury infractions and
prejudice.
A writer who claims to have investigated this case wrote a book that is biased and ignored evidence in
Virginia's favor. At first glance the book appears authentic and takes
advantage of the unguarded curious reader. However, our examination of
the book and the evidence showed that the book is hugely inconsistent
with actual court testimony and FBI lab reports.
In sum, we discovered through careful examination
that the truth was not heard by the jury. As a result, an innocent woman
will die without your help.
Time is short and her life
is at stake. It is imperative that you help by donating what you can to
the "Save Virginia Fund." Monies collected will be used to hire a
special appellate attorney for her defense. You can donate through the
following means: Click here
This is
a short summary of the facts. Naturally, you will want to understand in
more detail what happened and judge for yourself. The rest of this web
site will answer your questions.
We hope that you, too,
will be convinced of Virginia's innocence and will become part of the
team to free an innocent woman. It may be the most important thing you
ever do in your life.