October 22, 2000

Subject: Evidence

 

Dear Visitors

I am reading inquiries, which is a good thing, but unfortunately most inquirers are asking for fact evidence to assure them of Virginia's innocence. Although it is a good question, I can not give a canned response. So I encourage each of you to ask your contact; where does one go with evidence of murder, concerning the death of Norman Larzeler on March 8, 1991? How does one go about asking the State enforcement Agencies to interview private investigator Gary Mc Daniel, who claims to have taken the States investigative leads and located the perpetrators of the office burglary and shooting death of Norman Larzelere? The contact should be apprised that they can study the leads and form their own conclusions. So what else other than time do they have to lose to save Virginia's life and arrest the perpetrator.

I suggest you challenge the contact to review both trial transcripts and evidence as they make an independent determination as to believe the immunitized witnesses or conclude they lied and in all probability the prosecution suborned perjury to manufacture a case against the LARZELER's. Assure them that we expect them to waived my opinions as they form their own, but only after a cursory review of the States case and assure them they will wish to contact my sources, who will tell all. Tell them that we anticipate that the surviving immunitized witness will tell the truth, knowing she stands to lose her freedom for life.

Feel confident that any reservation about the innocense of Virginia Larzeler will be satisfied. Ultimately, I believe the "truth will set her free", but only if the investigation is independent and done with objectivity. The problem is there is no interest by the State who could be held liable for their actions. We our seeking a independent investigation under the direction of the Governors Office that is apart from the prosecution, who has done nothing to find the truth, but everything to subvert the truth, which includes targeting me the messenger for prosecution. So sorry they found no evidence, when it's over i will hand them a gold star for trying. Their record to date is an embarrassment, proving they can not conduct an objective review of the facts and that they should not be trusted to speak with my sources.

For your information it will be shown that the life of Norman was taken accidentally, when in interrupted a burglary of his office, upon returning early from lunch. That the perpetrators surveilled the Larzeler office that day and on early days to affirm their lunch schedule of workers and with the help of Kristen Palmieri the time was chosen. Unfortunately, things went bad and once the death occurred a cover up was executed with in the first hour, when authorities were contacted by knowledgeable persons. The authorities adjusted the stories told by the witnesses as the defense gathered up witnesses against Palmieri and Heidle. Heidle sought to protect his position, claimed his mothers car was used as Palmieri admittedly stated that she was willing to follow Heidle's cue. Palmieri still fears the true perpetrators, being that she as a co-conspirator planned the burglary. She now faces life behind bars and as recent as last year sought the legal advise and protection. of the orange County State Attorney's office, once I asked for her cooperation and she was assured the answers were know. Unfortunately, even then the authorities dared not ask any question's to affirm the prior admissions of the witness as it concerned her motives and fears that the defense was prepared to tell the real story, but hoped for her truthful cooperation against Heidle who later committed suicide. Ask them why not and if they had the duty to affirm their subsequent suspicions after the trial and acquittal of Jason Larzeler and the development of this web-site of information. Ask them if it is their job to play ostrich or our the an independent party, responsible for the truth? Ask them if they at anytime suspected that the immunitized witnesses were lying? I submit yes and that is the principal reason that the State Attorney of Orange County did not invite a court reporter to transcribe the testimony to the grand jurors, who I would enjoy interviewing as to the admissions of the witnesses Heidle/Palmieri as I attempt to affirm the many conflicts in the fact evidence, concerning inconsistent statements in the testimony. Should you solicit a response from authorities ask about the Search Warrant Affidavit being inconsistent with the testimony secured by the State on July 3, 1991, regarding the storage, possesion and disposal of the weapons which were claimed to be taken from the accused by the witnesses and disposed? Ask them why they never arrested the perpetrators of the OAK RIDGE GUN SHOP BURGLARY on 12/6/1990, certainly they realize that the public would have an interest to locate more than 60 weapons that were stolen, traded for drugs and sold in the neighborhood. Then ask yourself, if the ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF & STATE ATTORNEY'S office lack the interest too solve three homicides arising from the theft of those weapons is their interest self serving and for what reason. I suggest you vote them out of office and then ask the governor to examine the case, believing a reasonable person will conclude that an investigation into the burglary of the Oak Ridge Gun Shop would have solved the murder of Norman Larzeler and other crimes. As for the importance of solving the Oak Ridge case; the states witness against the Larzelers took possession of weapons stolen from the store. So why not investigate the chain of custody and circumstances surrounding the theft of weapons. For your information the authorities identified the perpetrators, solicited the cooperation of accomplices and then said the weapons were in the nearby lake, but it was a dirty job to confirm the story. So no one went diving, nor did they offer immunity to those perpetrators of the Oak Ridge Store to identify the killer of Norman Larzeler.

In summary, feel comfortable when you ask your contact to investigate new evidence and old evidence. Ask them to consider a independent investigation and reserve no more than 25 hours to evaluate the available evidence, during which they can interview at least 5 informants, before conducting a phase two investigation. It's a fair request, because the Orange County State Attorney's office was afraid to record the Grand Jury testimony that indicted the LARZELER's and for ever we will be in the dark unless the court orders a evidentiary hearing on the evidence and prior conflicting testimony. In the words of Paul Harvey only then will we know "the rest of the story". Are you interested?

Thanks for your support and prayers,

Gary J. Mc Daniel, Private Investigator