Supreme Court justice supports death penalty moratorium
Ginsburg April 10, 2001
Web posted at: 1:43 AM EDT (0543 GMT)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Monday she
supports a proposed state moratorium on the death penalty, adding that
accused murderers with good lawyers "do not get the death penalty."
Ginsburg criticized the often "meager" amount of money spent to defend poor
people, and said she would be "glad to see" Maryland become the second state
after Illinois to pass a moratorium on imposition of the death penalty. But
the effort failed a few hours later when Maryland lawmakers adjourned for the
year without voting on the measure.
"I have yet to see a death case among the dozens coming to the Supreme Court
on eve-of-execution stay applications in which the defendant was well
represented at trial," Ginsburg said in a lecture on the importance of public
service law.
"People who are well represented at trial do not get the death penalty," she
added later.
Ginsburg has gone on record as saying she would have granted last-minute
stays, or delays, in capital cases. The Supreme Court has at least a
five-member majority in favor of the death penalty in general.
The justices have agreed to hear a case next fall testing whether mentally
retarded people may be executed.
Speaking at the University of the District of Columbia, Ginsburg also
proposed a legal service corps on the model of VISTA public service program
that sends mostly young volunteers to help the poor.
"How much healthier to enlist young people in this kind of community service
than to sign them up for armed combat," she said.
Ginsburg ducked a question about the Bush v. Gore case that ended ballot
recounts in Florida and effectively decided the 2000 election for President
Bush, saying she made her point in her written dissent. She was among the
four-member minority that supported the continued recounts sought by
Democratic candidate Al Gore.
Politically liberal lawyers, professors and politicians made up much of the
audience at the public, open-enrollment university. Ginsburg smiled but did
not applaud during partisan introductory remarks by B. Michael Rauh,
president of the District of Columbia School of Law Foundation.
Although identified with liberals and organizations such as the American
Civil Liberties Union, public service law or other legal work donated by
lawyers to the needy is not strictly a liberal cause, Ginsburg said.
"Our system of justice works best when opposing positions are well
represented and fully aired. I, therefore, greet the expansion of responsible
public interest lawyering on the conservative side as something good for the
system and hardly a development to be deplored," she said.
She cited the work of three conservative public interest law groups: the
Washington Legal Foundation, Pacific Legal Foundation and Mountain States
Legal Foundation. All are frequent participants in Supreme Court cases.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FloridaDemocrat-unsubscribe@egroups.com