Facts of the case

 Request For Evidentiary Hearing

 Beth Weitzner

 Objections To Report Of Magistrate Judge

Medical Reports

 

 

2018.jpg (5989 bytes)

 

The Defense Team

Mr. Fuster initially hired attorneys Michael Von Zamft and Jeffrey Samek to represent him in his probation revocation matter. Once criminal charges were filed against Mr. Fuster and Iliana, the court declared them indigent and appointed Von Zamft and Samek to represent the couple. Mr. Von Zamft, in turn, hired an investigator, Stephen Dinerstein, to look into various matters connected with the defense.

On April 26, 1985, State Attorney Janet Reno wrote to Mssrs. Von Zamft and Samek, stating the following:

It is my intention to make a plea offer to Iliana Fuster which would include testimony against her husband and codefendant, Francisco Fuster. Please let me know as soon as possible your opinion and thoughts on the matter.

Not surprisingly, in early May, Mr. Von Zamft decided the defenses of Mr. and Mrs. Fuster should be officially severed. He, therefore, petitioned the court and asked that he be appointed to represent Iliana separately and that Mr. Samek be charged with Mr. Fuster’s representation. The court granted permission for them to do so.

 


| Back to Mainpage | Back to Top |


 

Facts of the case

 Request For Evidentiary Hearing

 Beth Weitzner

 Objections To Report Of Magistrate Judge

Medical Reports