ÿWPCš7 U…P4¡ ³_¹×:Ò¹Êq¿DÂnˆNbu¡Ÿ!ý⥥ž– ÏؾBø‘Jª3gGæÉ•½‘7k.QV.?tg‡9™ù7ËèÅbIÅð¾®ßÑȽñXƽ¨ÔËÝF$ºÿÈ.±£‰¾·‡á˜GÈbFc€»É=ÌìÜU¯¶U “­Ye\èsfr`ñê4ß³–ÿÂëÅå°!#°ëåܨLJ„PÛèL[tÁ¸°»âa ±Y¼o?õѦý[^Õ†ærcÙº]w+dž|Ñš†Ö(÷œ†7VB±öó] a{%sE^g“LZºE¯éNR¼éÓDÃmCÆdº‚3€¦žº^—7rŒ]¬SßÍIú:an?«2”35÷¸HdR i gF|öPá/|0×ïr°g#§Ùp¸NurîFg³ˆÊe/~ ÷É=îÅ€½ëh‘{*.¡Ç¶ÒíĨhµS/ÙaÕ³*®@íŒz*¿'"J„“ɳxÕF&ƒ1 «ŠýòW(½œ§î¹;Uú‘¢¶Cenº}×f_ã}ƒ™‰dt@ãgøÊ@àl0h9L[ª˜cPœfê$&þš6Œ´îÄrÔ@ KúÒÞ$¿¤œŽˆŽâ_.3a‰ñ×Ù!R§Ð#!`)UN* %Ï* 0(Õ*^ ý*w + 1u +4‚+–+¥+ m§+ Z¾+ 1‡,NŸ,…¡, 0l&- 0D’-@Ö-?0ÖU3 72+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+5+56]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5]5 B“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6“6 1‡°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6°6 0c77˜HP DeskJet 600 (Color)Ȱ,,,,Ȱ0(ÈhH  Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡(+×3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)ăû*"3|x ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀSpaziano v. State, 660 So. 2d 1363, 13651(ehCEKQW]cioAutoList41.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. {Ô_ÔòòSpaziano€v.€Stateóó,€Ð ° Ðà  à660€So.€2d€1363,€1365€(Fla.€1995)60€So.€2d€1363,€((3üÝ$¤¤Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó 6Ý ƒüÝ$Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼{¤»XXÔThe€Texas€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals€is€dealing€with€interpreting€a€similarÐ ° ÐDNA€statute€in€its€state.€€The€court€granted€a€stay€of€execution€on€July€25,€2001€inÐ Â Ðthe€Richard€Kutzner€case€in€order€to€have€the€time€to€examine€and€interpret€its€newÐ Ô$ ÐDNA€statute.€€See,€underlying€case,€òòKutzner€v.€Stateóó,€994€SW2d€180€(Tx€Crim.Ð æ6 ÐApp.€1999).€€The€same€should€be€true€here.€€€ 5Ý ƒüÝ$Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼{¤»XXÔInterestingly,€the€June€13òòthóó€order€gave€the€State€thirty€days€to€draw€Mr.Ð ° ÐBogleððs€blood.€€The€blood€was€not€draw€in€the€thirty€day€time€period.€€The€StateÐ Â Ðobtained€an€extension€of€the€time€to€draw€the€blood.€€If€the€time€for€filing€aÐ Ô$ Ðpetition€challenging€the€discovery€order€allowing€the€blood€draw€has€run,€then€soÐ æ6 Ðhas€the€time€for€the€State€to€draw€the€blood.€€Since€the€State€was€relying€on€theÐ øH ÐJuly€18òòthóó€order€when€it€scheduled€a€blood€draw€for€July€31òòstóó,€clearly€Mr.€BogleððsÐ  Z Ðaccompanying€petition€is€filed€within€thirty€days€of€July€18òòthóó€and€is€timely. ÌÝ ƒüÝ$Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€¼Ÿ@»XXÔSimultaneous€with€the€filing€of€this€pleading,€Mr.€Bogle€is€filing€his€InitialÐ ° ÐPetition€seeking€review€of€the€circuit€courtððs€orders€permitting€the€State€to€obtainÏpost„conviction€discovery€and€to€extract€from€Mr.€Bogleððs€body€a€sample€of€hisÏblood.€€He€incorporates€by€reference€herein€the€arguments€in€that€petition.€€i) BOGLETrepalFuentet]here nunc tuncarguendoSpazianoZeiglerDuestKutznerTx Crim FDLEBACKHUSIzakowitzVollrath d(àCEKQW]cioAutoList3i.i.i.i.i.i.i.i.(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  àÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ8€XXdìdÈ8ÑÔ€¼Ÿ@»XXÔà@  ìàò òIN€THE€FLORIDA€SUPREME€COURTˆÐ ° Ðó óÌò òÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àÌBRETT€A.€BOGLE,Ìà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÌà  àPetitioner,ÌÌØØÓb€ 6(à83bÓÝ ‚Ï3£ ÝÝ  ÝÝ‚Ï3£ÝÔ2àÔÚ  ÚvÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  àÝ  Ýà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àCASE€NO.€SC01„1607݃Ï3£,ÝŒÐP  (#(# ÐŒÝ  Ý€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à0 p àLower€Court€Case€No.€91„Ð d´  Ð12952Ð p(#p(# Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÌà  àà ` àÌSTATE€OF€FLORIDA,€ó óÐ ´  ÐÌò òà  àRespondent.Ð Ü, Ð________________________________/Ìó óÌò òòòà@ZZìàREPLY€TO€STATEððS€RESPONSE€IN€OPPOSITION€TO€DEFENDANTððSˆÐ h Ðà@ÌÌìàMOTION€TO€STAY€PROCEEDINGS€AND€RESPONSEˆÌà@l l ìàTO€STATEððS€MOTION€TO€DISMISSˆÌÌóóó óà  àò òCOMES€NOW€THE€DEFENDANT,€BRETT€A.€BOGLEó ó,€ÓÓby€and€throughÐ h¸ Ðundersigned€counsel,€and€hereby€files€the€following€reply€and€response€to€theÏStateððs€motion.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Ð À  Ðà  àThe€State€suggests€that€Mr.€Ô_ÔBogleÔ_Ô€has€missed€the€deadline€for€filing€a€petitionÏon€his€interlocutory€appeal€based€on€òòTrepal€v.€Stateóó,€754€So.€2d€702€(Fla.€2000)€Ð %`  ÐÔ_ÔThis€is€incorrect.€€ò òòòóóó óSeveral€facts€that€were€omitted€from€the€Stateððs€procedural€historyÐ ° Ðexplain€why€this€is€not€so.€€Ð ° Ðà  àOn€June€13,€2001,€Judge€Fuente€ordered€that€DNA€testing€could€beÐ Ô$ Ðconducted€in€Mr.€Bogleððs€case€and€that€the€State€could€extract€Mr.€Bogleððs€bloodÐ øH Ðin€order€to€conduct€that€testing.€€This€was€ordered€pursuant€to€oral€requests€by€theÐ  l ÐState€first€made€on€May€24,€2001.€€€At€the€May€24thòòóó€hearing,€the€issue€had€beenÐ @  Ðdeferred€to€a€later€date€for€argument.€Ð d´  Ðà  àOn€June€6,€2001,€defense€counsel€argued€that€the€State€should€be€required€toÐ ˆØ  Ðmake€a€showing€of€good€cause€for€its€discovery€request.€€As€the€State€concedes,€inÐ ¬ü Ðits€Response€in€Opposition€to€Defendantððs€Motion€to€Stay€Proceedings€and€StateððsÐ Ð  ÐMotion€to€Dismiss€Appeal,€ð ð[a]€court€order€is€[]€needed€to€obtain€samples€of€theÐ ôD Ðdefendantððs€blood€and€to€release€any€evidence€in€the€property€of€the€Clerk€of€CourtÐ h Ðto€be€tested.ðð€€However,€the€State€says€that€ð ð[t]here€is€no€support€for€[Mr.€Bogleððs]Ð <Œ Ðclaimðð€that€the€State€was€ð ðrequired€to€show€cause€for€retesting.ðð€€Response€inÐ `° ÐOpposition€to€Defendantððs€Motion€to€Stay€Proceedings€and€Stateððs€Motion€toÐ „ Ô ÐDismiss€Appeal,€at€4.€€Ð ¨"ø Ðà  àOn€June€13,€2001,€Judge€Fuente€issued€his€order€stating€that€the€State€didÐ Ì$  Ðnot€have€to€show€good€cause.€€As€the€State€has€explained:€ð ðBogle€also€argues€thatÐ ð&@"  Ðby€requesting€retesting€the€State€is€conceding€error€and€should€be€required€to€showÐ )d$" Ðcause€for€retesting.€€There€is€no€support€for€this€claim€and€the€trial€courtððs€denialÐ 8+ˆ&$ Ðof€this€argument€was€clearly€within€its€discretion.ðð€€Response,€at€4.€€Ð ° Ðà  àCounsel€filed€a€notice€of€appeal€and€a€motion€to€stay€the€blood€draw€inÐ Ô$ Ðorder€to€permit€appellate€review€on€June€21,€2001.€€However,€the€trial€court€didÐ øH Ðnot€rule€on€the€stay€motion,€which€included€the€issue€of€the€deadline€for€the€bloodÐ  l Ðdraw,€until€it€could€hear€argument€of€counsel.€€That€argument€could€not€beÐ @  Ðscheduled€due€to€Judge€Fuenteððs€busy€court€docket€until€July€13,€2001.€€And€theÐ d´  ÐState€agreed€to€not€proceed€with€the€blood€draw.€€On€July€18òòthóó€after€the€July€13òòthóóÐ ˆØ  Ðhearing,€Judge€Fuente€set€a€new€deadline€of€August€2,€2001,€for€the€blood€draw.€Ð ¬ü ÐOn€July€27,€2001,€Judge€Fuente€issued€a€replacement€order,€òònunc€pro€tuncóó€to€JulyÐ Ð  Ð16,€2001,€setting€the€deadline€for€the€blood€draw€as€August€2,€2001.€€The€StateÐ ôD Ðscheduled€the€blood€draw€for€July€31,€2001.€€Ð h Ðà  àThe€State€argues€the€thirty€days€to€file€a€petition€challenging€the€discoveryÐ <Œ Ðorder€expired€on€July€13,€2001.€€Under€the€Stateððs€interpretation€of€òòTrepalóó,€theÐ `° Ðtime€for€filing€the€petition€in€this€Court€would€have€run€before€all€of€the€issues€hadÐ „ Ô Ðbeen€resolved.€€€The€time€should€run€from€the€date€of€the€Courtððs€final€order€ofÐ ¨"ø ÐJuly€18,€2001,€setting€the€deadline€for€the€blood€draw€for€August€2nd.€€òòóó€UnderÐ Ì$  Ðdefense€counselððs€interpretation€of€òòTrepalóó,€the€time€period€for€filing€the€petition€toÐ ð&@"  Ðthis€Court€would€run€thirty€(30)€days€from€the€last€of€the€trial€courtððs€orders,€whichÐ )d$" Ðwas€July€18,€2001.€€€Since€the€July€18òòthóó€order€relies€on€determinations€made€in€theÐ 8+ˆ&$ ÐJune€13òòthóó€order,€Mr.€Bogle€is€appealing€both€orders.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€€On€July€27,€2001,€Mr.€BogleÐ ° Ðreceived€a€ð ðreplacement€orderðð€filed€by€Judge€Fuente€on€July€24,€2001,€nunc€proÐ Ô$ Ðtunc€to€July€16,€2001.€€Evidently,€this€order€was€to€replace€the€Courtððs€order€ofÐ øH ÐJuly€18òòthóó.€€Therefore,€€the€thirty„day€time€period€would€run€either€from€July€16€orÐ  l Ð18òòthóó€depending€on€which€order€is€followed.€€Under€either€scenario,€Mr.€Bogle€hasÐ @  Ðnot€waived€his€right€to€appeal€ò òalló ó€of€the€orders€on€this€issue.€€If€counsel€erred,€itÐ d´  Ðwas€in€prematurely€filing€a€notice€of€appeal€because€she€was€uncertain€how€thisÐ ”ä  ÐCourt€could€entertain€a€motion€for€stay€if€notice€of€appeal€had€not€been€filed.€Ð ¸ ÐMore€importantly,€Mr.€Bogleððs€interlocutory€appeal€should€not€be€dismissedÐ Ü, Ðbecause€of€confusion€over€the€procedures€in€his€case.€€The€bottom€line€is€that€theÐ P Ðaccompanying€petition€was€filed€within€thirty€days€of€the€order€that€the€State€wasÐ $t Ðrelying€upon€to€schedule€the€blood€draw€for€July€31òòstóó.€€And€the€State€hasÐ H˜ Ðacknowledged€that€ð ð[a]€court€order€is€needed€[]€to€obtain€samples€of€theÐ l¼ Ðdefendantððs€blood€and€to€release€any€evidence€in€the€property€of€the€Clerk€of€theÐ  à ÐCourt€to€be€tested.ðð€€Response,€at€5.€Ð ´" Ðà  àThe€accompanying€petition€is€timely€filed,€as€it€is€filed€within€thirty€days€ofÐ ° Ðorder€upon€which€the€State€was€relying€when€it€scheduled€the€blood€draw€for€JulyÐ Ô$ Ð31,€2001.Ð øH Ðà  àEven€if€the€Court€finds€that€Mr.€Bogle€did€not€follow€the€proper€procedure,Ð  l Ða€review€of€the€lower€court's€orders€are€necessary€because€any€appeal€from€theÐ @  Ðfinal€action€in€this€case€may€not€provide€an€adequate€remedy€for€the€allegedÐ d´  Ðimpropriety.òòóó€€The€State's€arguments€elevate€form€over€substance€given€that€theÐ ˆØ  ÐState€is€not€arguing€that€Mr.€Bogle€cannot€appeal.€€Even€assuming€òòarguendoóó€thatÐ ¬ü ÐMr.€Bogle€did€not€follow€the€procedures€set€out€in€òòTrepalóó,€this€Court€has€made€itÐ Ð  Ðclear€its€"constitutional€responsibility€[is]€to€refrain€from€dismissing€a€cause€solelyÐ ôD Ðbecause€an€improper€remedy€has€been€sought."€€Ô € ÔòòSpaziano€v.€Stateóó,€660€So.€2dÐ h Ð1363,€1365€(Fla.€1995).€€To€dismiss€Mr.€Bogleððs€appeal€would€be€to€elevate€formÐ <Œ Ðover€substance.Ð `° Ðà  àThe€State€also€argued€that€even€if€Mr.€Bogleððs€appeal€is€properly€before€theÐ „ Ô ÐCourt,€it€is€without€merit€because€ð ðat€no€time€has€the€State€said€it€was€ððreopeningÐ ¨"ø Ðthe€criminal€investigation€of€Mr.€Bogleððs€case.ðððð€€See,€Stateððs€Response€at€page€4.€€Ð Ì$  ÐThe€State€contends€that€because€of€the€allegations€in€Mr.€Bogleððs€post„convictionÐ ð&@"  Ðmotion,€the€State€ð ðfelt€it€was€prudent€to€retest€certain€evidence€in€preparation€forÐ )d$" Ðany€subsequent€evidentiary€hearing.ðð€€See,€Stateððs€Response€at€page€4.€€Ð 8+ˆ&$ Ðà  àThe€State€has€failed€to€explain€what€evidence€it€intends€to€test,€saying€it€wasÐ ° Ðgoing€to€test€ð ðeverything.ðð€€In€its€Response,€the€State€contends€that€items€ofÐ Ô$ Ðevidence€were€ð ðneverðð€tested€for€DNA.€€See,€Stateððs€Response€at€page€2.€€This€is€aÐ øH Ðsurprising€development€since€Special€Agent€Deadman€testified€at€trial€that€thereÐ  l Ðwas€an€insufficient€sample€to€test€anything€else.€€The€State€failed€to€list€what€itemsÐ @  Ðwere€ð ðneverðð€tested.€€€€Instead,€the€State€now€wants€carte€blanche€to€retest€theÐ d´  Ðitems€of€evidence€that€it€says€were€improperly€tested.€€This€surely€is€re„opening€theÐ ˆØ  Ðcriminal€investigation.€€The€State€believes€it€is€entitled€to€re„test€the€evidenceÐ ¬ü Ðbecause€Mr.€Bogle€claimed€in€his€3.850€motion€that€he€is€innocent€and€that€theÐ Ð  ÐDNA€testing€done€in€1990„91€was€flawed.€€€However,€the€claims€that€Mr.€BogleÐ ôD Ðnow€makes€are€no€different€from€the€issues€at€trial.€€In€1991,€Mr.€Bogle€claimed€heÐ h Ðwas€innocent€and€that€the€DNA€testing€was€flawed.€€The€State€had€its€opportunityÐ <Œ Ðto€prosecute,€and€it€conducted€DNA€testing,€which€it€argued€was€reliable€and€thatÐ `° ÐMr.€Bogle€was€guilty.€€€In€fact,€Assistant€State€Attorney€Karen€Cox€argued€to€theÐ „ Ô Ðjury€in€closing€that:Ð ¨"ø ÐÓÓà8  àThere€was€a€well„connected€chain€of€events€that€leads€to€oneÐ Ì$  Ðconclusion€and€one€conclusion€alone,€but€the€Hillsborough€CountyÐ Þ%.! ÐSheriffððs€Office€continued€their€investigation€and€enlisted€the€help€ofÐ ð&@"  Ðò òthe€greatest€crime€laboratory€in€the€world,€the€FBI€CrimeÐ (R#! ÐLaboratoryó ó...Ð)f$"Ð Ð  ÐÌðð.€556„557).€€Óé*ÓObviously,€the€State€was€very€confident€in€its€results€in€1991.€€€Now,Ð @+&$ Ðthe€State€contends€that€it€is€entitled€to€re„test€its€ð ðreliableðð€evidence€without€statingÐ ° Ðwhat,€if€anything,€was€wrong€with€the€previous€testing€because:Ð Ô$ ÐÓÓà8  àDNA€testing€at€this€point€in€the€proceedings€is€the€most€expeditiousÐ øH Ðway€of€fairly€addressing€defendantððs€arguments...Ð ZÐ Ð  ÐÌÓ×-ÓSee,€Stateððs€Response€at€page€5.€€The€State€never€attempts€to€explain€why€theÐ . ~ ÐDNA€testing€that€it€is€proposing€will€result€in€evidence€that€is€not€barred€byÐ R¢  ÐòòZeigler€v.€Stateóó,€654€So.2d€1162€(Fla.€1995).€€€The€Stateððs€own€description€of€theÐ vÆ  Ðtesting€is€a€ð ðretesting.ðð€€Response,€at€3.€€There€is€no€explanation€for€why€reliableÐ šê  ÐDNA€testing€could€not€have€been€done€by€the€State€years€ago.€Ð ¾ Ðà  àPost„conviction€proceedings€are€brought€by€the€defendant€who€has€theÐ â2 Ðburden€of€proof€€to€establish€that€the€trial€was€constitutionally€unreliable.€€TheÐ V ÐState€must€rely€on€the€same€records€and€evidence€it€produced€at€trial.€€This€isÐ *z Ðsimilar€to€the€claim€in€òòJohnson€v.€Mississippióó,€108€S.€Ct.€1981€(1988),€where€theÐ Nž ÐState€had€introduced€a€judgment€and€sentence€that€was€later€declared€null€andÐ r Ðvoid.€€The€State€of€Mississippi€was€not€permitted€to€defend€the€sentence€of€deathÐ –!æ Ðobtained€on€the€back€of€the€invalid€judgment€and€sentence,€by€arguing€evidenceÐ º#  Ðthat€Mr.€Johnson€had€really€engaged€in€the€behavior€represented€by€the€invalidÐ Þ%.! Ðjudgment€and€sentence.€€Since€the€evidence€(the€judgment€and€sentence)€that€theÐ (R#! Ðjury€heard€had€been€established€to€be€unreliable,€the€only€question€was€whether€onÐ &*v%# Ðthe€basis€of€the€trial€record€was€the€error€harmless€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€Ð ° ÐWhen€an€unconstitutional€felony€has€been€considered€in€sentencing,€this€Court€isÐ Ô$ Ðrestricted€in€its€analysis€to€the€facts€and€issues€adduced€at€trial.€€It€cannot€considerÐ øH Ðwhether€the€defendant€really€may€have€committed€the€crime€at€issue€in€the€vacatedÐ  l Ðjudgment€and€sentence.€€The€reviewing€court€is€bound€by€the€record€in€assessingÐ @  Ðthe€prejudicial€impact€of€the€presentation€of€evidence€subsequently€established€asÐ d´  Ðunreliable.€Cf.€òòDuest€v.€Singletaryóó,€997€F.€2d€1336€(11òòthóó€Cir.€1993)(The€11òòthóó€circuitÐ ˆØ  Ðtwice€rejects€the€Stateððs€argument€that€Duest€would€have€been€sentenced€to€deathÐ ¬ü Ðregardless€of€the€consideration€of€the€unconstitutional€aggravating€factor€andÐ Ð  Ðholds€that€it€cannot€be€harmless);€òòRivera€v.€Stateóó,€629€So.€2d€105€(Fla.€1993);Ð ôD ÐòòPreston€v.€Stateóó,€564€So.€2d€120€(Fla.€1990).€€€Reliance€on€the€trial€record€toÐ h Ðdetermine€the€harm€from€the€discovery€that€the€jury€heard€unreliable€evidence€isÐ <Œ Ðnot€a€new€concept.€€Ð `° Ðà  àAlthough€the€State€has€conceded€an€evidentiary€hearing€on€these€claims,€itÐ „ Ô Ðhas€still€not€set€out€a€factual€or€legal€basis€for€DNA€testing,€nor€has€it€named€theÐ ¨"ø Ðitems€of€evidence€it€intends€to€test€that€were€ð ðneverðð€tested.€€The€State€asserts€thatÐ Ì$  Ðnot€only€was€there€no€previous€obligation€to€show€good€cause€before€it€seeks€post„Ð ð&@"  Ðconviction€discovery,€but€that€the€newly€enacted€Fla.€Stat.€ðð€925.11€does€not€applyÐ )d$" Ðto€the€State.€€Thus,€the€proper€interpretation€of€this€new€DNA€statute€that€is€atÐ 8+ˆ&$ Ðissue.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀Р° Ðà  àFinally,€the€State€has€erroneously€argued€that€Mr.€Bogle€would€not€beÐ Ô$ Ðharmed€by€the€State€re„testing€the€forensic€evidence.Ð øH ÐÓÓà8  àThe€only€possible€harm€that€the€defendant€has€asserted€is€that€theÐ  l Ðevidence€may€be€used€up€during€testing.€€Since€FDLE€is€theÐ . ~ Ðlaboratory€specified€in€the€statute€to€do€such€testing,€this€concern€is€ofÐ @  Ðno€moment.€€ÐR¢ Ð Ð  ÐÌÓS=ÓSee,€Stateððs€Response€at€page€5.€€Of€course,€such€an€event€would€violate€SectionÐ vÆ  Ð925.11(4),€Fla.€Stat.,€which€imposes€upon€law€enforcement€agencies€a€duty€toÐ šê  Ðpreserve€any€DNA€testable€evidence.Ð ¾ Ðà  àMoreover,€the€fact€that€FDLE€is€to€conduct€the€DNA€re„testing€is€of€greatÐ â2 Ðimportance€to€Mr.€Bogle€because€the€FBI€crime€lab,€which€trained€the€FDLEÐ V Ðtechnicians,€admits€it€bungled€the€testing€in€1991.€€That€is€why€the€State€finds€itÐ *z Ðnecessary€to€re„test€the€evidence€in€the€first€place.€€Justifiably,€Mr.€Bogle€has€noÐ Nž Ðconfidence€that€the€FDLE,€a€branch€of€the€prosecution,€will€be€any€more€thoroughÐ r Ðor€careful€than€the€ð ðgreatest€crime€lab€in€the€world.ðð€€In€fact,€the€police€officerÐ –!æ Ðwho€is€to€transport€the€sample€drawn€from€Mr.€Bogle€is€the€same€officer€whoÐ º#  Ðprosecuted€this€case€in€1991.€€Contrary€to€the€Stateððs€argument,€the€reliability€ofÐ ° Ðthis€testing€is€of€great€ð ðmoment.ððÐ Ô$ Ðà  àUnder€Fla.€Stat.€925.11,€Mr.€Bogle€is€entitled€to€request€DNA€testing€if€heÐ øH Ðcan€prove€the€requirements€under€the€statute.€€The€DNA€statute€does€not€give€theÐ  l ÐState€carte€blanche€testing€and€two€chances€to€prosecute€the€case.€€AnÐ @  Ðinterlocutory€appeal€should€be€entertained€in€this€case€as€is€explained€in€theÐ d´  Ðaccompanying€petition.Ð ˆØ  Ðà  àò òWHEREFOREó ó,€for€the€foregoing€reasons,€Mr.€Bogle€respectfully€requestsÐ ¬ü Ðthat€this€Court€allow€an€interlocutory€appeal€of€the€lower€courtððs€orders€permittingÐ Ü, Ða€blood€draw€in€order€to€conduct€DNA€testing€and€grant€a€stay€of€his€post„Ð P Ðconviction€proceedings€and€any€DNA€testing€pending€a€decision€by€this€Court€.€Ð $t Ѐà  àò òI€HEREBY€CERTIFYó ó€that€a€true€copy€of€the€foregoing€motion€has€beenÐ H˜ Ðfurnished€by€United€States€Mail,€first€class€postage€prepaid€to€all€counsel€of€recordÐ xÈ Ðon€August__,€2001.Ð œ ì ÐÓÓà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à__________________Ð À" Ðà0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà ¸ àÔð#@Ò#"Ôà  àà h àà À àTERRI€L.€BACKHUSà  àà x àà Ð àà @Ð àà @Ð àÐð#@(#(# Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àFlorida€Bar€No.€0946427Ð %R  Ðà0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àà0À(#À(#àà À àBackhus€&€Izakowitz,€PA.Ð&d!(#(# Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à303€S.€Westland€AvenueÐ &'v"  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àTampa,€FL€33606Ð 8(ˆ#! Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à(813)€259„4424Ð J)š$" Ðà  àÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àAttorney€for€Mr.€BogleÐ n+¾&$ Ðcc:Ð ° ÐMs.€Sharon€VollrathÐ Â ÐOffice€of€the€State€AttorneyÐ Ô$ ÐCourthouse€Annex,€4thòòóó€Floor€Ð æ6 Ð800€E.€KennedyÐ øH ÐTampa,€FL€33602Ð  Z ÐÌThe€Honorable€William€FuenteÐ . ~ ÐCourthouse€AnnexÐ @  Ð800€E.€Kennedy€Ð R¢  ÐTampa,€FL€33602Ð d´  ÐÌMs.€Kim€HopkinsÐ ˆØ  ÐAsst.€Attorney€GeneralÐ šê  Ð2002€N.€Lois€Ave.,€Ste.€700Ð ¬ü ÐTampa,€FL€33607Ð ¾ ÐÌ