IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. SC02-101
LOWER COURT CASE NO. 79-04512
LINROY BOTTOSON
,Petitioner,
DEATH WARRANT SIGNED
v. EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR
February 5, 2002 6:00PM
Michael Moore, Secretary,
Department of Corrections,
and Robert Butterworth,
Attorney General, et. al
Respondents.
________________________________/
PETITION TO INVOKE THIS COURT'S ALL WRITS JURISDICTION
PURSUANT TO ART. V, § 3(B)(1), FLA. CONST. AND FL.R.APP.P.
RULE 9.100
AND PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF
AND REQUEST FOR STAY OF TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS
AND REQUEST FOR STAY OF EXECUTION
COMES NOW THE PETITIONER, LINROY BOTTOSON,
by and throughhis undersigned counsel, and seeks to invoke this Court's All
Writs Jurisdiction pursuant to Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
In support thereof, Mr.Bottoson would show:
1. The Governor of Florida signed a death warrant for
Mr. Bottoson on November 19, 2001.
2. Counsel for Mr. Bottoson was appointed on December
3, 2001.
2
3. Pursuant to the trial court’s order, Mr. Bottoson
filed a Motion to Vacate Judgment and Sentence and
Request for Evidentiary Hearing and Stay of
Execution, under Fl.R.Crim.P. Rule 3.850, on January
11, 2002.
4. One of the claims raised by Mr. Bottoson asserts that
his execution would violate the federal and state
constitutions because Mr. Bottoson is mentally
retarded.
5. The United States Supreme Court has granted
certiorari in Atkins v. Virginia, No. 00-8452, to
determine whether executing individuals with mental
retardation violates the Eighth Amendment to the U.S
Constitution.
6. In Florida, the execution of mentally retarded
individuals has been addressed by Fla. Stat. §
921.137 (2001). This statute prohibits the
imposition of a death sentence upon a mentally
retarded defendant. However, the statute includes
the following limitation: "(8) This section does not
apply to a defendant who was sentenced to death prior
to the effective date of this act." The effective
date for the statute was June 12, 2001.
3
7. Consequently, Mr. Bottoson filed a Motion to Declare
a Provision of Fla. Stat. § 921.137 Unconstitutional
on January 15, 2002. (Attached as Appendix A).
8. The trial court, while declining to rule on the issue
of the statutory provision’s unconstitionality at
present, nevertheless set an evidentiary hearing to
address the issue of Mr. Bottoson’s status as a
mentally retarded individual. (Order dated January
15, 2002, attached as Appendix B).
9. Mr. Bottoson asserts that the trial court’s ruling,
setting an evidentiary hearing on mental retardation
does not conform to the essential requirements of law
as set forth in Fla. Stat. § 921.137 (1) and (4).
10. First, the statute, in subsection (1), requires that
the Department of Children and Family Services adopt
rules to specify the standardized intelligence tests
to be utilized in determining whether a defendant
will be included in the class which is protected by
the legislation. The trial court disregarded the fact
that, to date, no such rules have been promulgated.
Therefore, the trial court is requiring Mr. Bottoson
to proceed without adequate notice of what an
adequate showing of mental retardation entails.
4
11. Second, the statute, in subsection (4), requires that
certain procedural safeguards be in effect to satisfy
the requirements of due process as afforded all
capital defendants. (see Ake V Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68
(1985)) Again, the trial court’s order disregards
these requirements and instead requires Mr. Bottoson
to proceed without the due process afforded other
capitally convicted defendants asserting mental
retardation.
12. Furthermore, the trial court’s order will cause
"irreparable injury for which appellate review will
be inadequate." Trepal v. State, 754 So.2d 702, 707
(Fla. 2000). Mr. Bottoson will be forced to proceed
with a hearing without notice of the required showing
and without adequate procedural safeguards, and will
then be burdened with the outcome of such a illadvised
proceeding.
13. Mr. Bottoson would have to reassert this issue at a
statutorily sound proceeding without the ability to
have new standardized intelligence tests administered
due to practice effect i.e. rising test scores over
multiple administrations of the test. Thus, the trial
court’s determination on mental retardation will be a
finding of fact binding this Court and subjecting Mr.
5
Bottoson to potential procedural "double jeopardy".
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that this
Court issue this writ directing that the trial court rule on
the applicability of Fla. Stat. § 921.137 to Mr. Bottoson and
that a stay of the proceedings and the execution be entered
pending the resolution of this petition and all relief
requested herein.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing has been furnished by
U.S. Mail, first-class, prepaid/facsimile transmission/federal
express/hand delivery to all counsel of record, on this 15th
day
of January, 2002.
__________________________
Peter J. Cannon
Florida Bar No. 0109710
Assistant CCRC
__________________________
Elizabeth A. Williams
Florida Bar No. 0967350
Staff Attorney
CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL
COUNSEL-MIDDLE
3801 Corporex Park Drive, Suite
210
Tampa, Florida 33619
813-740-3544
Counsel for Mr. Bottoson
6
Copies furnished to:
Honorable Anthony H. Johnson
Circuit Court Judge
425 North Orange Avenue Rm#1110
Orlando, FL 32801
Kenneth S. Nunnelley and Judy Taylor Rush
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
444 Seabreeze Boulevard, Fifth Floor
Daytona Beach, FL 32118-3951
Chris A. Lerner
Assistant State Attorney
Office of the State Attorney
P.O. Box 1673
415 North Orange Avenue
Orlando, FL 32802-0613
Linroy Bottoson, DOC#078079
Florida State Prison
P.O. Box 181, Hwy 16 West
Starke, FL 32091-0747
Commission on Capital Cases
ATTN: Mary Jean
402 S. Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1300
Susan Schwartz
Assistant General Counsel
Florida Department of Corrections
2601 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500
The Honorable Thomas D. Hall
Clerk, Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court Building
ATTN: Tanya Carroll
500 South Duval Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1927
7
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing was
generated in Courier New, 12 point font, pursuant to Fla. R.
App. 9.210.
____________________________
Peter J. Cannon
Florida Bar No. 0109710
Assistant CCRC
____________________________
Elizabeth A. Williams
Florida Bar No. 0967350
Staff Attorney
CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL
COUNSEL-MIDDLE REGION
3801 Corporex Park Drive
Suite 210
Tampa, Florida 33619
(813) 740-3544
Counsel for Mr. Bottoson