TALLAHASSEE -- For
the fourth time, the Florida Supreme Court yesterday threw out the
death sentence of Jacksonville cop killer Andrea Hicks Jackson and
ordered a new sentencing hearing.
This time, the justices said Jackson's rights were violated
because she wasn't allowed to attend a hearing in Duval County two
years ago.
Jackson was first sentenced to death in February 1984 after being
convicted of murdering Officer Gary Bevel, who was shot six times
when he tried to arrest her.
She was also given the death penalty in 1992, 1996 and 1998 --
all overturned by the Supreme Court.
While the court's latest action once again puts Jackson's
execution in jeopardy, it doesn't affect her murder conviction.
The decision miffed Chief Circuit Judge Donald Moran, who
sentenced Jackson, and angered police and prosecutors.
Assistant State Attorney Bernie de la Rionda of Jacksonville
called the latest ruling a "further example of justice delayed."
"Three juries have recommended that the death penalty be imposed,
and the last time was by a 12-0 vote," de la Rionda said.
But Jackson's longtime attorney, Stephen Weinbaum, said Jackson
doesn't deserve to be executed because she didn't plan to kill
Bevel.
"This was simply not a premeditated murder," Weinbaum said.
Jackson, now 41, was convicted of shooting Bevel in May 1983 when
he tried to arrest her for filing a false police report about damage
to her car. Witnesses said Jackson shot the officer as he struggled
to get her into a police car at 26th Street and Boulevard.
The Supreme Court overturned Jackson's original death sentence in
1989 because of improper testimony by former Sheriff Dale Carson.
She was sentenced again to death in 1992, but that sentence was
overturned in 1994 because of improper jury instructions.
In 1996, Jackson was sentenced to death a third time, though it
was overturned a year later because Moran didn't provide a detailed
analysis of his reasoning. That led to the fourth death sentence in
1998.
Moran sentenced Jackson after receiving written arguments but not
holding a hearing. The Supreme Court said yesterday Moran should
have held a hearing that would have allowed Jackson to attend.
"Indeed, one of a criminal defendant's most basic constitutional
rights is the right to be present in the courtroom at every critical
stage in the proceedings," the court's majority wrote in the 5-2
decision.
Justices, however, said Moran shouldn't be blamed for the error
because of confusion stemming from other Supreme Court rulings.
After Jackson's sentencing, the court issued a ruling in a separate
case that clarified how judges should handle such cases.
The dissenting justices in yesterday's ruling, Chief Justice
Major B. Harding and Charles Wells, said Moran acted properly and
that Jackson was able to present her arguments in the written
documents.
Harding wrote that the "judge did what we told him to do. And
now, we reverse him."
Moran, who has handled the case since the original trial, said
the ruling was "amazing to me." But he said he would follow the
court's instructions and hold another sentencing hearing.
"I'm going to do whatever they tell me," he said. "It's not my
place to disagree with them."
The ruling came less than three weeks after state lawmakers
passed a plan to try to limit appeals in death penalty cases. De la
Rionda said the Jackson case shows why Gov. Jeb Bush, lawmakers and
the public have become frustrated by an appeals process that
sometimes leaves inmates on Death Row for decades.
"This is a perfect example of why the governor and others are
attempting to change the system as it exists," de la Rionda said.
John Pialorsi, business agent for the Fraternal Order of Police
in Jacksonville, also said he was frustrated. He said Jackson has
received "every, every, every piece of due course of law."
"You never bury the memory of Gary Bevel, because you can't [with
the case still pending]," Pialorsi said.